Cannabinoid-like Effects Of Five Novel Carboxamide Synthetic Cannabinoids

Figure 1.
These synthetic cannabinoids act directly at cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors as does Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) found in marijuana, but have different chemical structures unrelated to Δ9-THC, different metabolism, and often greater toxicity (Fantegrossi et al., 2014). Discriminative stimulus effects were tested in rats trained to discriminate Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (3 mg/kg, 30-min pretreatment). 5F-MDMB-PINACA (also known as 5F-ADB, 5F-ADB-PINACA), MDMB-CHIMICA, MDMB-FUBINACA, ADB-FUBINACA, and AMB-FUBINACA (also known as FUB-AMB, MMB-FUBINACA) were tested for in vivo cannabinoid-like effects to assess their abuse liabilit


The current study indicates that the test compounds produce locomotor depression similar to that of Δ9-THC, and fully substitute for the discriminative stimulus effects of Δ9-THC. In summary, these 5F-MDMB-PINACA, MDMB-CHIMICA, MDMB-FUBINACA, ADB-FUBINACA, and AMB-FUBINACA have similar abuse liability as Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and should be controlled in a similar fashion. Much of the in vivo https://cannabinoidsrc4f-adb.com/ testing of the synthetic cannabinoid compounds have been pre-clinical studies focused on their cannabinoid-like effects or like the present study, focused on their abuse liability. There is indication that at least some of the first-generation synthetic cannabinoids act at receptors other than cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 (Wiley et al., 2016), and a compound from the present study, 5F-MDMB-PINACA, was found to activate midbrain dopamine neurons, but not serotonin neurons (Asaoka et al., 2016

Thirty minutes prior to the training sessions, rats received an injection of either vehicle or Δ9-THC and were subsequently placed in the behavior-testing chambers, where food (45-mg food pellets; Bio-Serve, Frenchtown, NJ) was available as a reinforcer for every ten responses (FR10) on a designated injection appropriate leve

The locomotor activity assay was used to identify approximate time courses and dose ranges of psychoactive effects, which is useful for identifying parameters for drug discrimination experiments and are also predictive of the time course of the psychoactive effects in human user


Such decrease remained 2 hr after the administration (Table 4). In locomotor activity, methamphetamine treated group showed approximately 4.2 times increase compared to the negative control treated group. Change of body weight following the treatments with JWH-081 and JWH-210 in mic

While the patient's symptoms strongly suggest the inhalation of ADB-BUTINACA, it is worth considering that these symptoms could also be attributed to nicotine exposure, as the symptoms partially overlap with known nicotine effect


§ (3) of the Hungarian act of Forensic Experts (2016.XXIX), the data of the reported case can be utilized freely for scientific and educational purposes without special ethical permission. These results indicate that the simultaneous intoxication of SCRA and ethanol directly and exclusively caused the death of the two victims. The victims did not have any significant diseases that could have contributed to the outcome. Very limited data are available in the scientific literature about the possible effects of the combined consumption of SCRAs and ethanol. Several case reports describe that the presence of a little ng/mL (0.37–4.1) of SCRAs and a high—but not lethal—concentration of ethanol (1.45–2.7 g/L) directly and exclusively contributed to the death of the victim [24–27] (Table 2). The fact that 4F-MDMB-BINACA was not detected in postmortem urine samples is partly explained by the high rate of hepatic metabolism of SCRAs [11, 14, 22], but also suggests that the victims consumed 4F-MDMB-BINACA shortly before their death


When clinical presentation and/or initial DOA testing results are inconclusive, additional testing with LC-QTOF-MS can be valuable and is recommended. SCRAs and other NPS may not be detected by point-of-care DOA tests. In this case, the point-of-care DOA urine screening was not able to detect the synthetic cannabinoid ADB-BUTINAC


Locomotor activity in mice was tested to screen for locomotor depressant effects and to identify behaviorally-active dose ranges and times of peak effect. Previous studies have demonstrated that these compounds have chemical structures similar to synthetic cannabinoids known to have substantial abuse liability and act at the CB1 receptor. Tremors were not observed following AMB-FUBINACA during the drug discrimination study, but the maximum dose tested was only 0.1 mg/kg, which is 10-fold lower than the dose that produced tremors in the mice. AMB-FUBINACA has been implicated in severe adverse effects in recreational users (Adams et al., 2017; Hamilton et al., 2017), which suggests that the range between behaviorally active and toxic doses of AMB-FUBINACA is narrow. Following that line of reasoning, it should also be noted that some of the more recent compounds produced non-linear dose-effect curves and one compound produced an inverted U-shaped dose-effect, such that intermediate dose fully substituted, but higher doses did not (Gatch and Forster, 2018). All of the compounds identified as available on the recreational market and submitted to our laboratory by the US Drug Enforcement Agency for testing have fully substituted at some dose (Gatch and Forster 2014, 2015, 2016, 2018); however; it is important to note that not all structural congeners are active (Wiley et al., 2012